Is the new criminal law draconian?
In a recent fingerprint conference on September 1st, 2026 our Honorable Home Minister, Shri Amit Shah, proclaimed the introduction of new criminal laws aimed at securing a conviction for every reported crime in the Supreme Court within a mere three years.
This proposal raises significant concerns, as it seems to disregard the fundamental principles of justice.
The notion that every reported crime must lead to a swift conviction appears not only draconian but also a gross oversimplification of a nuanced judicial process.
Our existing laws, which have evolved painstakingly over time, embody a profound understanding of natural justice, equity, and good conscience.
They reflect a system designed to ensure that the innocent are protected while the guilty are held accountable.
The new laws, however, come across as a hasty attempt at reform driven more by the desire for mechanical justice than a genuine commitment to fairness.
By shifting the focus to a prosecution-oriented mindset, rather than one rooted in justice, these measures risk undermining the very foundations that safeguard our judicial system.
It is essential to uphold the wisdom of our traditional laws, ensuring they continue to address the complexities of human behavior and societal values, and appeals to our mind and conscience rather than falling prey to the pitfalls of a rigid mechanical approach in dispensing justice.
Gen. Editor: Law Points
Peter Lane Kolkata
x.com: @humvee
Comments
Post a Comment